---
title: Court finds fault with Motorola's patent licensing tactics
description: <p>Motorola will now face stiff fines following its inability to negotiate fair and reasonable patent licensing agreements with Microsoft.</p>
---

# [![Innovation Asset Group](https://www.innovation-asset.com/hubfs/Image/Decipher-Logo.png)](https://www.innovation-asset.com/)

- [Decipher®](https://www.innovation-asset.com/products-decipher)
- [Services](https://www.innovation-asset.com/products/professional-services-0)
- [Resources](https://www.innovation-asset.com/resources)
- [Blog](https://www.innovation-asset.com/blog)
- [About Us](https://www.innovation-asset.com/about)
- [Contact Us](https://www.innovation-asset.com/contact)

# Innovation Asset Blog

# Court finds fault with Motorola's patent licensing tactics

by [Peter Ackerman](https://www.innovation-asset.com/blog/author/peter-ackerman)

Motorola's management of patents deemed essential to the mobile device industry has invited [investigation from authorities](https://www.innovation-asset.com/intellectual-property-news/index.php/2013/05/16/233733/courts-could-soon-set-standards-essential-royalty-rates/) in the U.S. and abroad in recent years. This week, a district court ruling officially attached a monetary value to the company's patent licensing improprieties.

Like many major technology corporations, a portion of Motorola's patent portfolio is made up of fundamental inventions that anyone operating within the industry would need to take advantage of to produce viable alternatives. In the interest of market competition, patent holders are required to license these assets at fair and reasonable rates. However, courts have traditionally struggled to develop and apply formulas dictating how expensive is too expensive for certain royalties.

According to Ars Technica, jurors have now upheld a November ruling suggesting that the patent licensing fees Motorola was demanding from Microsoft were more than twice as expensive than necessary. As such, Motorola will now be liable for approximately [$14.5 million in damages](http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/09/4-billion-motorola-patent-demand-was-breach-of-contract-jury-rules/) - pending appeal.

While few patent holders operate at similar scale to Motorola or Microsoft, the results of this case could have a [transcendent impact](http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-57601432-75/) on intellectual property law at large. According to CNET, this week's decision marks an important step toward a formalized framework that determines how much patent owners can reasonably demand from interested licensees.

![Peter Ackerman](https://www.innovation-asset.com/hubfs/blog_images/Peter%5B5926%5D.jpeg)

### [Peter Ackerman](https://www.innovation-asset.com/blog/author/peter-ackerman)

Founder & CEO, Innovation Asset Group, Inc.

[September 06, 2013](https://www.innovation-asset.com/blog/court-finds-fault-with-motorolas-patent-licensing-tactics)

### Subscribe to Email Updates

### Introducing Decipher®

### Categories

- [Intellectual Property Management (459)](https://www.innovation-asset.com/blog/topic/intellectual-property-management)
- [Commercialization and Licensing (210)](https://www.innovation-asset.com/blog/topic/commercialization-and-licensing)
- [Invention Disclosure (201)](https://www.innovation-asset.com/blog/topic/invention-disclosure)
- [Innovation Strategy (20)](https://www.innovation-asset.com/blog/topic/innovation-strategy)
- [Ideas for Good (6)](https://www.innovation-asset.com/blog/topic/ideas-for-good)
- [Innovation Team (3)](https://www.innovation-asset.com/blog/topic/innovation-team)

### News Archives

- [January 2013 (26)](https://www.innovation-asset.com/blog/archive/2013/01)
- [September 2012 (25)](https://www.innovation-asset.com/blog/archive/2012/09)
- [October 2012 (22)](https://www.innovation-asset.com/blog/archive/2012/10)
- [November 2012 (22)](https://www.innovation-asset.com/blog/archive/2012/11)
- [November 2010 (21)](https://www.innovation-asset.com/blog/archive/2010/11)
- [February 2011 (21)](https://www.innovation-asset.com/blog/archive/2011/02)
- [July 2012 (21)](https://www.innovation-asset.com/blog/archive/2012/07)
- [December 2012 (21)](https://www.innovation-asset.com/blog/archive/2012/12)
- [January 2012 (20)](https://www.innovation-asset.com/blog/archive/2012/01)
- [March 2012 (20)](https://www.innovation-asset.com/blog/archive/2012/03)

##### Portland, Oregon USA

##### © Innovation Asset Group, Inc.

##### [Privacy Policy](https://www.innovation-asset.com/privacy-policy/) | [Terms & Conditions](https://www.innovation-asset.com/terms-and-conditions/) | [Contact Us](https://www.innovation-asset.com/contact/)

- <https://www.linkedin.com/company/innovation-asset-group_2>
- <https://twitter.com/InnovationAsset>

![](https://www.conversionruler.com/bin/tracker.php?siteid=7009&nojs=1)